Logo

David Alter: Assessing Maple Leafs Options To Improve Their Defence

Assessing Maple Leafs Options To Improve Their Defence

The Maple Leafs could be willing to make a big swing on defence. But as Ozoon’s David Alter writes, the improvements come in many ways.

The Toronto Maple Leafs enter late October still searching for answers on a blue line that has shown its limitations even as the offence continues to generate scoring chances. With Chris Tanev sidelined by an upper-body injury that general manager John Chayka described as “progressing nicely” after the veteran took part in a non-contact morning skate, the club has leaned on a mix of veterans and depth options while making clear it is open to external help.

It’s been reported that Toronto has told other teams it will move a premium asset for a true difference-maker on the back end and has little interest in short-term patches or deals that send A-level pieces the other way for B-level returns. The organization has also signaled a willingness to move an older player to bring in a younger one, reflecting the age profile of a group that features Morgan Rielly, Jake McCabe, Oliver Ekman-Larsson and Tanev among its regulars.

Among the names that have surfaced, Zach Whitecloud of the Calgary Flames fits the profile of a steady, right-shot option who has already played meaningful minutes for a Stanley Cup contender. Whitecloud carries a $2.75-million cap hit through 2027-28 and has logged heavy penalty-kill duty since arriving in Calgary. League sources have pegged the cost of acquiring him as significant, potentially involving an A-level prospect or a first-round pick in some combination, and Whitecloud himself has said he views Calgary as home and wants to stay. That combination of price and the player’s preference makes a deal far from straightforward.

Rasmus Ristolainen of the Philadelphia Flyers has also been linked as a physical right-shot defender who can handle 20-plus minutes. He is in the final year of a $5.1-million contract and has been the subject of trade discussion for multiple seasons. The Flyers have indicated they are open at the right price, but Ristolainen’s injury history, he recently returned from a hand issue only to aggravate it, complicates any evaluation. A deal would likely require salary retention or a comparable outgoing contract from Toronto to fit under the cap.

Lower-cost options remain available if the Leafs prefer not to part with major assets. Carson Soucy, on a one-year deal in Columbus, Brenden Dillon in New Jersey, and Nick Perbix in Nashville have all been mentioned as serviceable middle- or bottom-pair pieces who could be acquired for more modest returns such as a mid-round pick. None would transform the blue line, but each could add depth while Tanev works back.

Bigger swings have also been explored. The Leafs have held exploratory conversations involving restricted free agents Simon Edvinsson of Detroit and Alexander Nikishin of Carolina. Both project as younger, higher-upside options capable of stepping into a top-four role. The obstacles are steep: both are seeking substantial long-term contracts, and any acquisition would require significant futures plus corresponding salary movement to satisfy the cap.

On the asset side, Toronto has the Colorado Avalanche’s 2027 first-round pick, prospects such as Ben Danford and Tinus Luc Koblar, and the possibility of including an older piece such as Ekman-Larsson, who carries a 16-team no-trade clause and a $3.5-million cap hit for this season and next. Easton Cowan has drawn interest in past discussions, but his strong early-season play has reduced the appetite to move him. Cap space remains limited, with the club already operating near the upper limit after the late-September acquisition of Kirill Marchenko.

Chayka has emphasized that any addition must provide long-term value rather than a temporary bridge. With Tanev’s return timeline still fluid and the defence continuing to rely on combinations that include Troy Stecher, Darren Raddysh and Dakota Mermis, the trade market remains active. Whether a deal materializes before the November window or waits until closer to the deadline will depend on the price of the available difference-makers and how the current group holds up in the weeks ahead.